The Truth About The Fearless Girl Statue 


Wall St. feminists hijack man’s self-funded artwork to push SJW agenda




The Fearless Girl statue heralded by feminists, which stands in opposition to the Charging Bull statue on Wall St. in Manhattan, was commissioned by a trillion-dollar investment group that’s part of the transnational ruling class funding third-wave feminism.

In comparison, the Charging Bull statue was sculpted – and self-funded – by Sicilian immigrant Arturo Di Modica who said it represented “the strength and power of the American people” in response to the recession triggered by the stock market crash of 1987.

But now, with the addition of the Fearless Girl statue, the bull now represents what feminists call “patriarchal oppression,” meaning that Di Modica’s work has been corrupted into a political statement he never intended, and that’s why he wants his statue removed from the spot it has stood for nearly 28 years.

“I put it there for art,” he told reporters. “My bull is a symbol for America. My bull is a symbol of prosperity and for strength.”

Fearless Girl derives its entire meaning – and its name – from the bull; without Di Modica’s statue, the girl would have nothing to be fearless of.

“She’s not angry at the bull — she’s confident, she knows what she’s capable of, and she’s wanting the bull to take note,” said Fearless Girl sculptor Kristen Visbal, admitting that her statue is entirely dependent on Di Modica’s for context.

Visbal was commissioned by State Street Global Advisors to create Fearless Girl for the anniversary of the fund’s “Gender Diversity Index” which, not ironically, has the NASDAQ ticker symbol SHE.


Read the rest of this story, just click here: The Truth About The Fearless Girl Statue » Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!



This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Memory Hole (“the site”) is making such material available in an effort to further understanding of political, social, economic, and scientific issues, etc. The site asserts this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply